What if we were nothing more than random parrots? | technology

I know you can’t start a story with a date, but in this case, accuracy is essential. On November 28, 2022, I attended a conference on the application of technology in the legal world at the invitation of my friend Laura. He told me, “I will leave you corner And talk about what you want. The only stipulation is that you come without a computer.” As a good Madrilene, I signed up for a two-pipe bombardment so I asked him to tell me what corner (it turns out to be a corner selling knowledge like the one that gives perfume a scent) and what highly innovative topics they’ll talk about: kanban, processes, Brainstorming with improvisation cardsLinkedin legal sale customer journey And things like that. He still did not know very well what to do among the many Anglo-Saxon proposals. Laura told me I could talk about my big mistakes or an improvement story. The first suggestion was overwhelming to me and the second clichéd, but it set me on the right track for what to choose. I was reminded of the tweets showing that GPT wrote better football records than Rajoy’s or those of writers and screenwriters who were amazed by this tool. So I suggested I do something that no one but me cares about: tell me my unbiased experience using GPT to write legal scripts. I cheated on another friend, Mighty, with whom I shared a moment of closeness as if it were a piece of a little theatre. Despite setting up a Pimpinela-style presentation (Maite was the wisecrack and I was a tech enthusiast), we didn’t have much acceptance. In moments of the greatest dramatic tension, we did not reach five persons, and this despite the fact that the result of the experiment was much better than I ventured when I proposed the subject. GPT Playground in its version 3 at the time, using DaVinci as its engine, produced some reasonable leases (even with some humor and context), some pathetic lawsuits, but formidable contracts and legal texts in English. It was the first time in the legal world that an AI spoke to us in Spanish. All available pay products are Anglo-Saxon and required, so far, an unpaid training effort that was far superior to the performance obtained. The language barrier and a different legal system protected us from the technological attack on the legal profession. I understand that this feature has ended.

See also  Emoticon: 🔥👀👍: A dictionary for understanding 'online' conversations in 25 major emojis | technology

I concluded from that small corner of the world that generative, cheap, easy and good AI in Spanish would change the legal world in the medium term and I went to a classical concert. As a good title would say clickbaitWhat happened next will surprise you.

Two days, two days later performance, OpenIA launched ChatGPT and not a day has gone by since then that at least one legal event – webinar – coffee with legal brownies hasn’t been held where the challenges, threats and opportunities of GPT to the legal world have been discussed. Not to mention the millions of messages, articles, tweets and chat experiences with this clever bot, which culminated in the annoying experience last February of merging GPT in its version 4 with the Microsoft Bing search engine, which journalists turned out to be terrifying. and the cocky HAL-style AI from “2001: A Space Odyssey”. ChatGPT was a file cover time And generative artificial intelligence has turned, who would have thought, Microsoft into the current, and fresh, company in the search engine market in the face of the consolidated Google, which, quickly due to events, announced its own version, Bard which was falsely loudly issued in response to which it was used. as an advertisement. Bad start for AI and its internal review systems, causing Google’s price to crash due to the blunder. The penultimate chapter in this crazy race was the introduction of GPT4 at the beginning of March with new capabilities, such as creating a website by simply “reading” a pencil drawing or combining text with images. To further disguise themselves as a company that left philanthropy to pursue profit, OpenAI published a sheet of all the news that was more like a flyer than a scholarly text.

See also  The National Institute of Statistics is bringing the government closer to achieving the goal of restoring pre-pandemic GDP before 2024

Who is this hype I draw several conclusions. One, I am a visionary whose vision I will never exploit. And the second, that we are a disaster at predicting tsunamis even though it was announced years ago. OpenAI, owner of Transformer Generative Pre-training Transformer, GPT, was founded in 2015 as a non-profit entity that was no longer a non-profit corporation when Microsoft pulled it out of poverty (it consumed money like a coal locomotive). Precisely this consumption of resources, combined with the modest results, raises questions about its viability, and we have doubts whether such a frantic scenario will be possible in the short term. But, as we all know, that was the case. Surprising to have caught everyone but Google, with its resources deep in a fig tree, says a lot about this tsunami of slow cooking but critical impact techniques. As much as we love it, we have a hard time putting ourselves in unlikely events, especially if they interfere with our business.

Back in the legal world, in this term, in addition to activating the many assemblies, GPT3 passed the US bar entry test with zero (although it passed it in its version of GPT4), one of the most demanding software in the world has ever used in the formulation of sentences. For me, this remains an anecdote. Currently, access not only to comprehensive databases but also to coherent interpretation in natural language calls into question our privileged system based on memory, from the profession of the individual to the system of opposition to the higher bodies of the state. But also that GPT has an API, a universal connector, that allows us to “put” this AI behind any service, from a WordPress blog to an automated legal advice system. I know you’ll tell me you’re still making many mistakes, but that is that GPT, the tool, not chat, allows you to work out your own repository of information (fine tuning), at an outrageous price and without the technical barrier that exists if done using a Microsoft service. I can turn a GPT, or my website, or my app, into a divorce expert and let you draft claims with minimal supervision. The Galactic Office is within the reach of anyone, even those who are not lawyers. Unbridled opening of legal services without the participation of lawyers. It is hoped that lawyers will become the human interface to AI systems, which will only have those who can afford them. A society that falls into two categories: those who can afford privacy, security, and human interaction, and those who cannot. And even here, my prediction for today.

See also  Alberto Sangiovanni Vincentelli receives the Fronteras Prize for revolutionizing the chip industry | technology

Those who know the bravery of these systems, like magicians who know the trick, are amazed. To them, it is nothing more than a relational system, some random parrot dropping coherent words without understanding what you are saying. The question is, if a parrot can effectively replace a large portion of lawyers’ work, what does that say about us?

You can follow The Country Technology in Facebook And Twitter Or sign up here to receive The weekly newsletter.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button