Ukraine accuses Putin of holding Belarus a “nuclear hostage”

Without knowing how the war will develop in these first days of spring when temperatures start to rise, the truth is that the conflict seems to be getting worse or at least entering a new phase after Russian President Vladimir Putin’s statements regarding the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus. Although his decision confirms what has been known for years,… strong relationship Which unites Putin with the Belarusian dictator, Alexander Lukashenko, also mentions that the Kremlin leader is not willing to put up with any gesture that he interprets as a threat to his interests. In this way, the President justified his decision by referring to the supply of depleted uranium weapons by the United Kingdom to Ukraine.

Faced with this new impulse, NATO, the United States and, of course, Ukraine, responded on Sunday with statements that ranged from caution to anger and more than obvious concern.

NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu lamented Sunday: “Russia’s nuclear rhetoric is dangerous and irresponsible.” NATO remains vigilant and monitors the situation closely […] We have not noticed any changes in the Russian nuclear device that would lead us to modify our device.

In one accusation that Putin made and tried to argue with his actions, asserting that the United States had been moving tactical nuclear weapons into the territory of its allies for decades, the alliance responded with nuances and negatives. He pointed out that “Russia’s reference to the NATO nuclear agreement is Totally misleading […] NATO Allies act in accordance with their international obligations […] Russia has systematically violated its arms control obligations, and recently suspended its participation in the New Beginning Treaty.”

See also  The Peruvian government describes the prosecutor's office's complaint against Castillo as a "coup without weapons"

In a more succinct and calm manner, US State Department spokeswoman Vedant Patel made the remarks on CNN with the clear intent of reducing fear. “We have not seen any reason to adjust our strategic nuclear posture or any indication that Russia is preparing to use a nuclear weapon,” Patel said, adding that Washington “will continue to monitor the ramifications” of the plans announced by the Kremlin.

“Russia’s nuclear rhetoric is dangerous and irresponsible,” NATO spokeswoman Oana Lunescu lamented.

More harshly, perhaps as a result of the direct suffering Moscow is capable of, Oleksiy Danilov, secretary of Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, denounced on Sunday that Russia had made Belarus a “nuclear hostage”. “Putin’s statement is a step towards internal destabilization of the country: it increases the level of negative perception and general rejection of Russia and Putin in Belarusian society. […] “The Kremlin has taken Belarus hostage with a nuclear weapon,” Danilov said in a message on Twitter.

petition to the United Nations

Expressing no less concern, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICANN) on Sunday joined in rejecting Putin’s action, which it called “a very dangerous escalation.” “The condemnation of all nuclear weapons threats is of paramount importance at this time. The npt [Tratado sobre la Prohibición de las Armas Nucleares] It is the most efficient way for any government to do this and raise the usage limit. Parking, as Russia intends to do in Belarus, is totally unacceptable,” its interim CEO Daniel Hugesta explained on Twitter.

In an effort to rectify the situation, Kiev asked the United Nations on Sunday to convene an urgent meeting of the Security Council, a measure by which it intends to put an end to “Russian military blackmail». “Ukraine expects effective measures from the United Kingdom, China, the United States and France to counter the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail,” the Ukrainian government said in a statement. It is not clear if this initiative will achieve anything, the only certain thing at the moment is that the war continues. Over a year later, the Russian invasion continues to wreak havoc.

See also  Juan José Toribio : «Los gobiernos ganan con la inflación, pero la sociedad no»

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button